Hi Matt:
The Amas from 2007 till this year were considerably smaller than the 2015. Have you clambered over the folded up Ama on a 2015? No? I'd love to see that done smoothly. I am neither little no light in weight, and the idea of getting over the Ama has less than limited appeal to me. The comments from so-called experienced owners aren't coming from owners of a 2015. Take a look at the size of the 2015 Amas vs the older ones. Clambering over those is not exactly an easy process. Insulting me by saying I have a closed mind shows your mindset, not mine. I have a very different configuration than the previous years of Adventure Island, so while the suggestions made along the way are not cast aside lightly, they are seen in light of the configuration of my boat, not one from 2007-2014. Furthermore, moving the Ama forward from the seat does not seem like an easy task if I'm facing a 10 knot breeze.
In my earliest posting I wondered if there wasn't an engineering reason for them being set up the way they are. While I can't be 100% certain that the crash provision you write of could be engineered into cross braces coming from the bow, I have a hard time seeing why they cant be. After all they are oriented 180 degrees opposite on the Tandem Island, now aren't they?
As I write, I'm looking at
http://www.hobiecat.com/mirage/mirage-tandem-island/I see the crossbraces on the Tandem Island face from bow to stern, although they are on the stern Aka. Why would orienting them they same way from the bow Ama for an Adventure Island be of any significant difference, except for improving the user experience of the boat?
Just because "We've always done it that way" doesn't make it the right way, does it? Just because no one has pointed this out before doesn't invalidate the suggestion, or is "Not Invented Here" an obscene phrase?
The most damaging phrase in the language is “We’ve always done it this way!”
— Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper in an interview in Information Week, March 9, 1987, p. 52
“A provision of endless apparatus, a bustle of infinite inquiry and research, may be employed to evade and shuffle off real labor—the real labor of thinking.” Joshua Reynolds