ozglxvr6 wrote:
The Dog wrote:
Like ncmbm, I'm not sure what you're planning is a real good idea. The loads are way different. That Matt hasn't chimed in is interesting.
Brian C
Does 2 feet of mast make that much of a difference? It would seem that the boat is engineered to withstand quite a bit more force than it would normally take, for longevity purposes.
I would most likely be using 18 sails.
Thanks!
Dave
Those are questions best asked of the boat designers....
But while I'm just a "grunt" at a Authorized Hobie Dealer, I am also a retired engineer.
And every design has a margin of error. What you propose will definitely eat into the margin of the 17.... A lot. The 18 rig is bigger and heavier. Period.
What you need to consider is not just the mast height. You also need to think about the difference in sail area, center of effort in the rig, differences in the shroud anchor points and the whole jib issue. Plus, the 17 hulls are much finer than 18 hulls.
My 17 was one of the early ones (3rd one in Texas). While it was a fine boat (which I used and abused before I knew better), I would not do what you're proposing even to hulls fresh off the line. And that's from someone who likes to push limits and gave up Hobie cats because they were "slow".
So while I shared that the H-17 and 18 masts seem to share an extrusion, my advice is:
Don't do it.
Brian C
p.s. edited to trim quotes