Hobie Cat Forums

It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:53 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Hull-atious review
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:02 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 44
Location: San Antonio, TX
We have had several discussions concerning the hull design characteristics of the Outback, the Sport, the Quest and the Adventure. I have said a few times that the Adventure hull is much more like that of the Quest than it is the Outback. I finally got my Quest and Adventure at the same place at the same time so took this opportunity for a pictorial study. Disclaimer-I am not claiming to be a kayak hull designer. These are just my observations/experience.

The Outback/Sport Hull design has a deep center sponson with relatively flat side sponsons. As long as the kayaker has enough weight to get those side sponsons into the water this design gives great primary stability. If not, it can feel a bit tippy. Will it actually tip over? Although possible, the hulls hard chine will most likely prevent it. But, when it goes, it goes, boom, you’re in the water. Here is a picture by Apalach that shows what I am talking about for both the Sport, on the left, and the Outback, on the right. Deep center sponsons, wide flat side sponsons and a relatively hard chine.

Image

Here is a similar view of the Adventure, on the left, and the Quest, on the right

Image

You see the center sponsons are very little deeper than the side sponsons and a soft chine. I think the primary stability for the Quest/Adventure hull design comes from the relatively flat (slightly rounded?) hull, overall length and a lower seating position (lower center of gravity). The grooves separating the hull into the three sponsons aid somewhat in tracking. Also, I feel the three shallow sponsons account for some of the speed reported for both of these kayaks, less wetted area and less hull resistance. The wide soft chine allows a transition (range of motion?) as the hull rolls before it actually tips over. Have I actually tipped over in either kayak? No, not yet. My time is coming!

More design characteristics of the Quest/Adventure design.

Plumb Bow line

Image

Rear skeg and hull

Image

Rocker, superimposed centerline. The rocker is actually very similar but it shows more readily in the Quest because it is three feet shorter than the Adventure.

Image

Another hull view from the rear

Image

Quest detail

Image

Adventure detail

Image

I hope some of you find this helpful or interesting.

Kyt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:04 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Captain

Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Sandy Eggo
Very nice pictorial essay. Thanks for posting these images. You've really done a nice job of displaying the differences and similarities of the Hobie hulls. There's no question, Hobie modeled the Adventure after the Quest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:17 am 
Offline
Site Rank - Deck Hand

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:50 am
Posts: 11
Location: Florida Panhandle
Hey Kytflyr the pics and review are fantastic. You never know how similar things are til you make a side by side comparison. My guess is that you have just answered a lot of questions folks might be having about which one to choose. Looks like it's only a matter of pedals and cash......


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BossHoss, Voyager and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group